From dishwashers and washing machines to computers and televisions, more than 50 unalike types of products are covered under the Energy Star program. But Consumer Reports' tests show the Energy Star doesn't always exceptional the biggest vitality savings or boodle savings. Consumer Reports found problems with the Energy Star program and its exam concordat that can sequel in manufacturers labeling their products more energy-efficient than they are when you in actuality use them.
Consumer Reports' tests found big discrepancies with two newer French-door refrigerators. Samsung says a refrigerator, which qualifies for an Energy Star, consumes an estimated 540 kilowatt-hours per year. But Consumer Reports' tests, which are more taxing than Energy Star to better mirror real-life use, show the refrigerator uses 890 kilowatt-hours per year. LG says a refrigerator, which also has an Energy Star, uses an estimated 547 kilowatt-hours per year.
But Consumer Reports' tougher tests show drive use could be more than insincere that. Not all Energy Star communication is so far afield. Maytag says a newer French-door refrigerator uses an estimated 547 kilowatt-hours per year. Consumer Reports tests show 565 kilowatt-hours per year. Federal officials have acknowledged that examination procedures have not kept estimate with technology.
Consumer Reports reckon that needs to change. Despite the problems, the Energy Star can still be a advantageous head check. And if the offering you want has an Energy Guide, set side by side the mazuma savings on that label, too.
Consumer Reports also recommends that the ministry carry out unaligned verification of Energy Star assay results. If you're looking for another virtuousness pertinence before you pre-eminent to the store, be enlightened that Consumer Reports lists might capability for dozens of separate products in its Ratings.
Video:
Opinion link: there
No comments:
Post a Comment