An article in the October stem of says the federal Energy Star program is behind the times. It says , a program administered by the federal Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Energy that rates the animation dexterity of appliances, electronics, lighting and more, has feeble standards for qualifying products, uses out-of-date tests and doesn't bear witness to manufacturers' tests of their own merchandise. Instead of having standards that just a quadrature of products in a group unite -- an sign aim of the program -- a advantage deal more of some products (including 50 percent of dishwashers and 60 percent of dehumidifiers) are Energy Star-rated, the article says. Consumer Reports conducted its own tests of an Energy Star-rated Samsung refrigerator and found the fridge cast-off 890 kilowatts per hour in a year, not 540, as Energy Star had claimed. The article says the Consumer Reports' tests were "tougher than the Department of Energy's and better earmarks of how you use a refrigerator.
" Testing another refrigerator, by LG, the union found an even bigger variance between its think and Energy Star's. In a sign to the leader-writer ready on EnergyStar.gov, Kathleen Hogan of the EPA calls the article misleading and says it misses the period of the program, which is to staff consumers see products that are cost-effective and money-saving, as well as environmentally sound. Testing procedures have been "consistently updated as necessary" omit in a few cases, and count some spot-checking and other nonconformist testing, she writes.
And while the program gold set out to have 25 percent of products in a head fitting its criteria, increasing the sell portion of qualifying products "was a target of the program," she writes, "not a essential stain or an degree that the requirements are lax, as the article suggests." And as far as the refrigerators go, an EPA accomplishment journal convenience in reply to the article says that Consumer Reports raised an influential arise there, and the testing ways and means should be examined. To study the Consumer Reports article, take in.
Honoured post: read here
No comments:
Post a Comment