Both phones have almost no internal reminiscence to utter in off, but luckily both can be upgraded with micro SD cards up to 16 GB. Camera: The Nokia X2 has a five megapixel camera in disparity to the LG GW300’s two megapixel camera. However, safeguard in opinion that both cameras have fixed-focus.
This does not unusually perturb most users and would not have been noticed unless mucronulate out. This affable of unchanging target camera is mainly reach-me-down to elect portable phones more affordable and give it better pricing points. This does set limitations to the lot of low-cut light photography you will be able to do.
In this regard, the X2’s flame is a essential asset and gives its already much higher megapixel intent focus camera an acrimony over the competition. Conclusion: Nokia wins by certainly a margin. Screen size: The GW300’s 2.4 inch paravent is larger than the X2’s 2.2 inch.
It might not seem equal much of a transformation but you can c doxy in quite a few words at the font vastness that the phones are using. Both of them have the same fixedness surprisingly, and one would think that Nokia’s betray would look better because of the higher pixel density. But to be honest, both of their screens aspect almost the same. The LG has better sunlight visibility than the Nokia, which is also plagued by adverse viewing angles from the sides.
It seems Nokia avoid some corners with the screen. Conclusion: LG wins out on display. Keyboard: The X2 has a skimpy 12-key alphanumeric keypad compared to the total QWERTY on the GW300.
Moreover, the keypad is the flatbed standard and though the keys are big enough they are a morsel unaccommodating to press. The X2 is not made for paunchy texting it seems. The GW300 has no such issues, with its six buttons around the D-pad which put forward incredibly at one's fingertips shortcuts. Sure they glance tacky, but they represent engaged use of our contrasting thumbs.
Then it has a four-row QWERTY keypad. Think Nokia E71 rather than Blackberry. Conclusion: LG is the behaviour pattern to go if you arrange to SMS a lot.
Build quality: Both phones undergo miserly and plastic-like. The Nokia tries to have some metal trim, but cannot leather the occurrence that it is mostly plastic. Don’t envision any wonders from the bod supremacy on either.
Conclusion: Both are not very good, but are still ‘passable’ given their pricing. Memory and connectivity: Both transportable phones have phone books which bolstering 1,000 entries. Both phones have almost no internal tribute to converse in off, but luckily both can be upgraded with micro SD cards up to 16 GB. This upgrade would allocate both phones to substitution for your mp3 competitor if needed.
The X2 has a few accessory buttons on the lesser for its music functions as well if you are into that persuasion of thing. Both phones corroborate Bluetooth 2.1 with A2DP. Both do not frame WLAN, but you can still flip the internet using flexible EDGE internet. Conclusion: This is a draw.
Conclusion: Both phones are nice purchases. But the GW300 seems to be giving more bang for its demand amount of just under Rs10,000. The X2, which is similarly priced is a great proposal for anyone who wants the consolation of having dedicated music buttons on the tangential so they can interchange songs by reaching their hands into their pockets. The GW300 is also better suited for thick SMS usage, while the X2 wins out for anyone looking for a low-cost phone which offers a semi-decent camera.
Originally posted article: read here
No comments:
Post a Comment